There’s something about mergers and acquisitions that seems to bring out the hand-wringers. So much potential disaster, so little real guidance. Why is that?
On the surface, the communication challenge is pretty straightforward: you’re bringing two organizations together, typically competitors. That creates a raft of issues that need management. But it’s just that — management! Competent project managers know that repeatable processes are critical, but so are simple rules to govern all of the situations that don’t fall exactly into the neat buckets on one’s Gantt Chart.
Here are five simple rules to help any communicator be more effective when it’s time to put on the merger comms hat.
- Remember that employees are people. At the very outset, employee concerns are going to be the top of mind for them. They don’t much care about impact on customers, they care about whether their jobs, benefits, pay, taxes, etc., are changing. And, of course, you don’t know any of that early on. Plus, they don’t believe that you don’t know. Trust is broken almost immediately for the target organization, and it’s going to take time to rebuild it. The tendency (in publicly traded companies) is to use the merger press release as the template for employee communications. DON’T DO IT. Yes, a high proportion of employees will be stockholders, but that’s not how most see themselves. They’re employees, and right now they’re scared.
- Open channels quickly. Go ahead and let employees ask the same questions repeatedly. Tell people how many times you’ve been asked the question (e.g., “we received this question 11 times in our merger email, and four times on the merger voicemail line. Here’s what we know now…”), and keep repeating the answer. Open every incoming vehicle you can muster — discussion boards, email, voicemail, face to face meetings with leaders — and publish the questions and answers. Respect this process, even though it’s tedious. Acknowledging the questions that are being asked is critical to demonstrating that the new organization is listening. Social media should get a close look — it’s a vehicle for discussion, which is what we want early.
- Tell what you know, and why. There’s an uncomfortable place at which nearly all mergers start — the deal is announced, but is subject to various approvals before closing. Neither customers nor employees are likely to know the difference between the two. In many cases, the acquirer isn’t permitted to write or speak directly to the target’s employees, they have to work through the target’s communication team. We need to push to be open. Say why we’re going into a quiet period. Say why it’s the way it is. Say why it’s taking “so long” to complete. Just give people regular updates and a schedule for critical decisions.
- Send leadership out to meet people. When PNC Bank announced its purchase of National City Corporation in October of 2008, PNC CEO Jim Rohr was in Cleveland that morning for an informal meeting and conference call with managers. He certainly didn’t have answers to most of the questions uppermost in people’s minds, but his arrival put a human face on the acquiring company.
- Remember that you’re doing business today. Your employees need to know that they are still accountable for their work – mergers are a terrible distraction, and they often lead to organizations becoming “internally focused” rather than attending to their customers. Reinforcing that customers are depending on them appeals to employees’ sense of purpose. Besides, being known as someone who kept his or her focus on the business is a good way to keep your job.
More on this topic later in the week.
Excellent points. How companies treat their employees is the strongest signal about their culture (http://wp.me/pSCE3-c) and is an indicator of how much they value their customers. How many of us expect great service from companies that treat their employees poorly.
Hi Andrew – thanks for the comment. You’d be amazed what consumers will put up with — especially for “commodities” and among the most price-conscious. The airline industry is a good example – the value of low prices exceeds that of good service. My favorite airline by far is Continental, which until recently resisted the price-for-food trend, kept free entertainment for US coast-to-coast trips, etc. Now they’re heading down the same path as the rest of carriers… the thing that will continue to make them my first choice is that their tertiary hub is here in Cleveland, and I want that to continue (otherwise, we’ll be flying to Chicago, Philly, DC, etc. for too many hauls.)
Good post and great food for thought.
The emergence of “empowered publics” — including employees that leak information — also makes the orchestration of the TIMING of these announcements very interesting. It was not long ago that companies would communicate to employees first, then quickly follow with announcements. Perhaps that model is changed forever now, in favor of simultaneous announcements. I see this having an effect on mergers, downsizings, etc.
I may explore this further over at my blog –thanks for being the catalyst! If I do, I’ll link back to this article, if you don’t mind.
JD – thanks for the comment. The concept of embargo is quickly becoming ancient. Ideally, we’d want to let leadership know ahead of time to prepare for employee questions (as per the announcement of KEY and SocietyCorp back in 1994) — but the social media reality means we’re closer to the financial release model – it hits the wire and THEN it goes internal.
This will be hard on smaller companies without dedicated internal comms staff — sequential release rather than simultaneous will set us back a ways, especially if companies move up releases (6 a.m.-ish) to get a strong open on Wall Street…
By all means, blog away — I appreciate your kind words.
These tips are especially important when dealing with mergers of non-profit associations, which also need to keep donors, board members and volunteers engaged.
Donna, thanks for your comment. Yes, although I edited it out, I did have a couple of paragraphs on stakeholders such as you describe here. These ideas are pretty much applicable to any type of organization. Thanks again for stopping by.