<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking Theoretically About Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communicationammo.com/strat/research/thinking-theoretically-about-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communicationammo.com/strat/research/thinking-theoretically-about-social-media/</link>
	<description>We help people and organizations make their communications more effective and measure the results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dina Dembicki</title>
		<link>http://www.communicationammo.com/strat/research/thinking-theoretically-about-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Dina Dembicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communicationammo.com/?p=219#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Sean, as always, you make some astute observations. (And you&#039;re teaching at my alma mater!) 

I can attest to the feeling of being &quot;in the clique&quot; with my fellow posters at the About.com Graphic Design forum. I haven&#039;t met any of those great folks, but everyone has posted responses to my comments, questions, rants and raves, and I feel like I know them. There have been some excellent conversations there--about design, the business of design, software and hardware, all kinds of things both work-related and not--and some excellent advice. Most qualify their responses--they are a very &quot;authentic&quot; lot. Even though it&#039;s words on the computer screen, it feels very genuine and sincere. I&#039;ve connected to them on LinkedIn and Facebook, and am following them on Twitter--they&#039;re my &quot;computer friends.&quot;

Getting back to your point, as I&#039;ve connected to these individuals on other online networks, we&#039;ve all been exposed to each others&#039; online networks. The  &quot;expanding network&quot; is an unavoidable byproduct, just as networking in person increases one&#039;s visibility in the physical community. My goal in joining these conversations has been to increase my visibility on the &#039;net, not necessarily to increase my online network. I want someone I meet in person to be able to google me and get some taste of my intellectual capabilities, thought processes, whatever. In the meantime, I have gained immeasurable support and information that I don&#039;t think I could have gotten anywhere else. 

Cronyism, possibly. But I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll replace traditional media. Maybe I&#039;m a dinosaur, but I still like the feel of the newspaper in my hands and a cup of coffee at my side, and the inertia of using the clicker to get the news at night when I have to step away from my computer to maintain my sanity and give my aching wrist a break. (That doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t have to think.) 

I was having a conversation the other day about Amazon&#039;s Kindle and Sony&#039;s book reader. We both agreed that the physical act of reading a book is as much a part of reading as the words. Turning the page, the feel of the paper, the size of the text (I am a graphic designer, can&#039;t help it), the weight of the book in your hand, lap or book bag--those tactile qualities are something that any electronic book can&#039;t touch. Plus you can still read a book if your batteries are dead. 

ANyway--interesting thought, as expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, as always, you make some astute observations. (And you&#8217;re teaching at my alma mater!) </p>
<p>I can attest to the feeling of being &#8220;in the clique&#8221; with my fellow posters at the About.com Graphic Design forum. I haven&#8217;t met any of those great folks, but everyone has posted responses to my comments, questions, rants and raves, and I feel like I know them. There have been some excellent conversations there&#8211;about design, the business of design, software and hardware, all kinds of things both work-related and not&#8211;and some excellent advice. Most qualify their responses&#8211;they are a very &#8220;authentic&#8221; lot. Even though it&#8217;s words on the computer screen, it feels very genuine and sincere. I&#8217;ve connected to them on LinkedIn and Facebook, and am following them on Twitter&#8211;they&#8217;re my &#8220;computer friends.&#8221;</p>
<p>Getting back to your point, as I&#8217;ve connected to these individuals on other online networks, we&#8217;ve all been exposed to each others&#8217; online networks. The  &#8220;expanding network&#8221; is an unavoidable byproduct, just as networking in person increases one&#8217;s visibility in the physical community. My goal in joining these conversations has been to increase my visibility on the &#8216;net, not necessarily to increase my online network. I want someone I meet in person to be able to google me and get some taste of my intellectual capabilities, thought processes, whatever. In the meantime, I have gained immeasurable support and information that I don&#8217;t think I could have gotten anywhere else. </p>
<p>Cronyism, possibly. But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll replace traditional media. Maybe I&#8217;m a dinosaur, but I still like the feel of the newspaper in my hands and a cup of coffee at my side, and the inertia of using the clicker to get the news at night when I have to step away from my computer to maintain my sanity and give my aching wrist a break. (That doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t have to think.) </p>
<p>I was having a conversation the other day about Amazon&#8217;s Kindle and Sony&#8217;s book reader. We both agreed that the physical act of reading a book is as much a part of reading as the words. Turning the page, the feel of the paper, the size of the text (I am a graphic designer, can&#8217;t help it), the weight of the book in your hand, lap or book bag&#8211;those tactile qualities are something that any electronic book can&#8217;t touch. Plus you can still read a book if your batteries are dead. </p>
<p>ANyway&#8211;interesting thought, as expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

