This Tuesday, 12 April, I pinch hit moderating the #MeasurePR Twitter discussion at 12 Noon Eastern, batting for the estimable @Shonali Burke. We’re going to talk B.A.D. measurement — BS, AllWet and Dumb. It’s a continuation of a theme for me — there’s so much crap measurement and stupid metrics that we need to squash, it’s worth chatting about. Who knows, maybe we’ll get some folks who disagree! #MeasurePR is at 12 Noon, Tuesday, 12 April. Secondly, a week from Thursday, 21 April, is the return of #ICChat on internal communications. Frankly, the participation’s been a little light — maybe not enough internal commsters are on Twitter, or maybe it’s not a creative enough topic from me. Or, I haven’t marketed it enough. Whatever. If you want to talk Internal Comms, join us at 10 a.m. Eastern Time on 21 April.
Posts Tagged ‘employee’
4 Steps to Build Relationships with HR (& others)
Tuesday, August 17th, 2010
It’s an axiom that the Human Resources and Public Relations teams often don’t get along, though as with the IT crew, we should be fast friends and excellent partners.
Let’s face it, it can’t be easy to be an HR pro these days. “HR jobs are often the last to go in a recession. Layoffs, wage freezes, benefits cuts, discrimination lawsuits, new government regulations and other recession-fueled workplace developments all generate additional HR work…” (Workforce Management, May 2010, p. 16). All that extra work, especially the human factors, have to bring a boat-load of stress.
We PR folks haven’t had it easy the last couple of years, either, as our staffs and budgets got squeezed. Long hours, multiple shifting priorities… That’s even more a reason to partner-up, even as compadres in misery.
Whether in good times or bad, HR or IT, what do we do to foster professional relationships? Follow these four steps:
1. Communicate: Start by opening lines of communication. Reach out, go for coffee or lunch, ask lots of questions about HR’s business goals and how they’re striving toward them. Put yourself in their shoes. HR folks have a lot to offer, and a lot of times, just need your expression of interest to open up. Besides, that’s how we’re supposed to gather business intelligence, anyway — by talking to people.
2. Coordinate: Where do your worlds intersect? HR content is important, whether for employees or for external constituencies. What events, projects, initiatives are on the horizon? Again, look at it from their perspective. It may seem basic, but the big issue is the old right-had/left-hand disconnect. Help to reconnect by sharing information from your broad perspective and by being ready to make a few changes to your plans to accommodate HR’s situation and goals. You want employees to be informed, and so does HR. You want the organization to attract qualified prospective employees, and so does HR. We’re not so different from one another — we’re professionals with jobs to do.
3. Collaborate: Every department has been doing more with less. Pitch in and offer to help out. At Goodyear, I volunteered to be part of an organizational effectiveness audit. My participation allowed the audit to move a bit more quickly and spare some folks a couple of really long days. It also allowed me to hear from our front-line employees face to face. They weren’t shy about their experiences with leadership, and communication. I was able to look through HR’s lens — thinking and talking about how to improve the organization. Plus, I built trust, won some allies and made some friends in the organization, always helpful outcomes for a communicator. Yes, we’re all busy, but it’s worth the investment of time.
4. Counsel: The heart of being a trusted counselor is the relationship. Working hard at forging professional bonds with your HR team gets noticed. For that matter, you could apply these steps to any constituency, whether you’re in conflict or not. When you’re known for your curiosity, willingness to help and ability to add value to a discussion, you’re setting a strong foundation for relationships and your role as a trusted adviser — a seat at the strategic table.
You still need to bring the goods, by the way — your planning, advice and writing have to be first-rate. The assumption of expert status must be backed up by your outstanding performance, again whether you’re working with HR, Finance, IT or whomever.
When you do it right, you’ll discover what great partners they can be.
HBR: Research Shows Futility, Not Fear, Quashes Employee-Manager Dialogue
Wednesday, May 26th, 2010A group of researchers looked into the state of employee-manager discussion and found that fear of retribution is not the leading cause of employee silence. Instead, it’s futility, at least among the professional class, and among women, a Harvard Business Review story said today.
If this research can be extrapolated, the emphasis we communicator-types have placed on helping managers create a “safe” environment for people to speak up isn’t helping managers get the straight scoop that they need. It’s almost an HR article of faith that humanistic style, paying close attention, smiling and telling people you really want them to share is the path to effective leadership. Now this.
Does employee feedback matter? It does to employees, but we can’t get at the problem presented by this research without addressing the elephant in the living room… When they give feedback, does anything happen to fix the issues they share? It’s just like doing employee surveys — if you aren’t willing to change your organization as a consequence of the research, don’t do it.
The disappointment of truly thinking like a business owner and offering suggestions that go nowhere is soul-crushing. Why do it if it just doesn’t matter? Cue up Bill Murray and “Meatballs.”
On the other hand, what if organizations committed to changing where it makes sense and letting people know. Sounds kind of, well, motivational.
Nah.
Communication Important in Change Management (Shocking!)
Tuesday, May 25th, 2010A professor from San Francisco State used three quick cases to show that when employees are dealing with difficult change initiatives, leaders have to talk with them. Stunning, eh? OK, I’m feeling snarky today, I admit it!
Professor Mitchell Lee Marks writes in the 24 May issue of the Wall Street Journal (in the MIT/Sloan Review section) that empathy, making the business case and getting employees to think about the future are essential to getting them to let go of the past and move on. It ain’t brain surgery, but for many business folks, the fact that there are actual people hiding under the numbers on the income statement can be a bit of a shock. Here’s a quick rundown of Dr. Marks’ thinking, and my two cents.
- Dr. Marks likes empathy, because employees often feel that no one understands their pain. He calls for leaders to acknowledge the feelings of fear and resentment. My Take: That’s an oversimplification. You run the risk of insincerity– remember President Bill Clinton’s “I feel your pain…”? You will have to demonstrate that you care — and it’s anyone’s guess whether you’ll be believed. You have to try, but it’s not a certainty that it will work. Nor is it certain exactly what kind of demonstration is most likely TO work. It’s trial and error. A bit of venting IS healthy, but not too much and not too often.
- Making the business case is the hardest dictum to follow, because the most persuasive facts and data from the leader’s perspective are often not-so-much for employees. My Take: Don’t make the business case into a pie-in-the-sky employee benefit if there is any chance of downsizing, layoffs, firings — whatever you want to call it. Making the business case is like the flip side of empathy, because it’s much more a left-brain activity. Facts and data eventually win the day, but have some pity for these folks.
- Looking to the future — the visionary leader sees the next objective, then the next and so on, and is supposed to keep us focused on the future. My Take: I don’t think you can get people to focus on how great the future will be until they exit the “anger” stage of their mourning. The world is changing fast. Talk about customers to move from problems to solutions.
I think what set me off was Dr. Marks’ tone (probably the editor’s tone, now that I think about it). It was as though all of this was brand spanking new.
News flash — every leader should know this backwards and forwards. It’s part of leading.
